This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libfortran/29568] implement unformatted files with subrecords (Intel style)
- From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Nov 2006 20:43:28 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libfortran/29568] implement unformatted files with subrecords (Intel style)
- References: <bug-29568-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #26 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-27 20:43 -------
(In reply to comment #24)
> Subject: Re: implement unformatted files with subrecords
> (Intel style)
>
> I have reviewed the patch and I have one minor comment. I suggest that the
> continued flag be placed in with the unit flags similar to has_recl. Only for
> consistency. I am in the process of testing still.
Hi Jerry,
looking at the unit_flags struct, I notice that all components are
determined by flags set on the I/O statement. Putting the continued
flag doesn't seem right to me.
Apart from that, I have put in a better error message and am
currently in the process of bootstrapping and regtesting.
Hopefully, I'll be able to submit tomorrow.
Thanks for your help!
Thomas
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29568