This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug other/23572] No warning for assigning a value to a 'float' variable that overflows with option -Wextra



------- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-11-25 15:24 -------
Why this is marked as "other" ? This is either a problem on the C/C++
front-ends or it is a problem in the middle-end that doesn't handle the
overflow/underflow correctly during conversion, isn't it?

Also, this happens also for i686-pc-gnu-linux and I guess for almost any
possible host/target, so perhaps Host and Target should say something
different.


-- 

manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
      Known to fail|2.95.3 3.2.3 3.4.0 4.0.0    |2.95.3 3.2.3 3.4.0 4.0.0
                   |4.1.0                       |4.1.0 4.2.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23572


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]