This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/29838] -fstack-protector shouldn't use TLS in freestanding mode
- From: "samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 15 Nov 2006 10:30:23 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/29838] -fstack-protector shouldn't use TLS in freestanding mode
- References: <bug-29838-11603@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #6 from samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org 2006-11-15 10:30 -------
So you are saying that gcc now imposes (whatever the kernel) kernel-land and
user-land to use the same TLS scheme, and now requires people to build a
cross-compiler before building a kernel from another kernel's userland? I
thought -ffreestanding was precisely meant to escape such considerations...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29838