This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/29825] [4.1 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 Nov 2006 16:34:53 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/29825] [4.1 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2084
- References: <bug-29825-5724@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-14 16:34 -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> > While that can help in this case, I think letting make_tree/expand_expr combo
> > create invalid RTL is very dangerous (and, at least from i386 backend POV,
> > some of the PIC UNSPECs not surrounded by CONST are invalid, the backend
> > guarantees that wherever it creates them it adds the CONST around).
Did you read what I wrote, I said it is not valid, the x86 back-end should
really be accepting it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29825