This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug testsuite/29761] 'make check' for gcc-4.1.1 fails
- From: "sergstesh at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Nov 2006 23:01:01 -0000
- Subject: [Bug testsuite/29761] 'make check' for gcc-4.1.1 fails
- References: <bug-29761-13529@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from sergstesh at yahoo dot com 2006-11-09 23:01 -------
Thanks for your reply.
Regarding
"
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/weak.C (test for excess errors)
Unknown and you should look into g++.log.
"
- you probably meant gcc/testsuite/g++/g++.log.sent file.
If it's the case, here's what I've found:
"
FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.law/weak.C (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lm
".
I think that the missing library is
/usr/lib/libm.so
which is present on my system. Is it so that 'gcc' test process doesn't
look for libraries in standard places ?
And if youy remember by heart, where can I downlaod sources of 'libm' from ?
Regarding 'glibc' - what is the best compatible with gcc-4.1.1 version ?
And why the number of failure so drastically differs between gcc-4.1.1 and
gcc-3.6.4 ? 'glibc' is the same in both cases.
Regarding 'glibc' - what is the best compatible with gcc-4.1.1 ?
Is there a 'glibc' version which is good for both gcc-3.4.6 and gcc-4.1.1 ?
If not, what is the best compatible with gcc-3.4.6 ?
Based on your answers I'll try to build 'glibc' myself - if necessary, it will
be two different versions for gcc-3.4.6 and gcc-4.1.1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29761