This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libfortran/27895] problem with RESHAPE and zero-sized arrays
- From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Nov 2006 11:51:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libfortran/27895] problem with RESHAPE and zero-sized arrays
- References: <bug-27895-10259@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #12 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-03 11:51 -------
Subject: Bug 27895
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Nov 3 11:51:09 2006
New Revision: 118455
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118455
Log:
PR libfortran/27895
* intrinsics/reshape_generic.c (reshape_internal): Fix so that it
works correctly for zero-sized arrays.
* m4/reshape.m4: Likewise.
* generated/reshape_r16.c: Regenerate.
* generated/reshape_c4.c: Regenerate.
* generated/reshape_i4.c: Regenerate.
* generated/reshape_c16.c: Regenerate.
* generated/reshape_r10.c: Regenerate.
* generated/reshape_r8.c: Regenerate.
* generated/reshape_c10.c: Regenerate.
* generated/reshape_c8.c: Regenerate.
* generated/reshape_i8.c: Regenerate.
* generated/reshape_i16.c: Regenerate.
* generated/reshape_r4.c: Regenerate.
* gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/zero_sized_1.f90: Uncomment checks
for RESHAPE.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/zero_sized_1.f90
trunk/libgfortran/ChangeLog
trunk/libgfortran/generated/reshape_c10.c
trunk/libgfortran/generated/reshape_c16.c
trunk/libgfortran/generated/reshape_c4.c
trunk/libgfortran/generated/reshape_c8.c
trunk/libgfortran/generated/reshape_i16.c
trunk/libgfortran/generated/reshape_i4.c
trunk/libgfortran/generated/reshape_i8.c
trunk/libgfortran/generated/reshape_r10.c
trunk/libgfortran/generated/reshape_r16.c
trunk/libgfortran/generated/reshape_r4.c
trunk/libgfortran/generated/reshape_r8.c
trunk/libgfortran/intrinsics/reshape_generic.c
trunk/libgfortran/m4/reshape.m4
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27895