This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug libstdc++/29426] [4.2 Regression] static __recursive_mutex init vs __GTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION

------- Comment #15 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-10-31 11:16 -------
> Eric, it looks like you've got this fixed now: great news. Solaris test
> results for 2.10, 2.9, and 2.8 looked fine for the last month and a half,
> so I'd assumed this patch was not problematic.

I think it is, up to Solaris 9, but the failure mode is not so blatant.

> As a side note, it's hard to deal with paging in and out WRT this bug report
> over two months. If we're supposed to care about Solaris-2.5-7, then please,
> post test results on a (at least) weekly basis.

I'd say that we (the GCC project) have to care about Solaris 7 and up only,
at this point.  I'm personally interested in Solaris 2.5.1 and 2.6 for some
reasons, but I will certainly not bug anyone about them.

And, yes, I try to post results on a weekly basis for all Solaris versions:

I don't have any for recent mainline though, but you probably have already
guessed why.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]