This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libfortran/29568] implement unformatted files with subrecords (Intel style)
- From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Oct 2006 20:11:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libfortran/29568] implement unformatted files with subrecords (Intel style)
- References: <bug-29568-10391@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-25 20:11 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Thomas,
>
> Have you written Adrain about his plans concerning his patch?
Not yet (I tried CC'ing him with this, but apparently this doesn't work).
IIRC (and Adrian, please correct me) his patch concerned the per-unit
setting of four-byte markers. Here, I'm trying to implement the Intel
subrecord markers.
> BTW, I think the Intel subrecord approach is probably the best
> solution to the large record problem.
I'm glad we agree on this.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-10-25 20:11:19
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29568