This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/29512] compile time hog / deadloop.
- From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 Oct 2006 19:36:12 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/29512] compile time hog / deadloop.
- References: <bug-29512-7667@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #6 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-10-19 19:36 -------
Subject: Re: compile time hog / deadloop.
>
>
> ------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-19 15:15 -------
> It _looks_ like we're needlessly recursing into the BINFOs in the i386 backend.
What that code is shooting for is to interpret the class hiearchy as an
union - each base class is walked and classified.
This is not exactly my area, but does the testcase really have so deep
nesting of base classes to this shows up in profiles?
Honza
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29512