This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/29408] [4.1/4.2 regression] parse error for valid code
- From: "mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 15 Oct 2006 21:21:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/29408] [4.1/4.2 regression] parse error for valid code
- References: <bug-29408-5724@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 21:21 -------
There is long-standing confusion in the C++ standard regarding the naming of
destructors in various situations. (Part of the issue is to what extent
destructors have names, and how the injection of class names into their own
scopes work, and how the lookup rules for qualified names apply to destructors,
and so forth.) However, I do think this code should be accepted; it doesn't
look like one of the particularly tricky cases.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29408