This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/29426] [4.2 Regression] static __recursive_mutex init vs __GTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION
- From: "bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Oct 2006 09:48:04 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/29426] [4.2 Regression] static __recursive_mutex init vs __GTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION
- References: <bug-29426-4066@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-11 09:48 -------
This is a regression, oh well.
Can you confirm for me that mingw32 is a target w/o __cxa_atexit?
I don't suppose it will make any difference, but can you please try:
- __gnu_cxx::__recursive_mutex static_mutex;
+ static __gnu_cxx::__recursive_mutex static_mutex;
best,
benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29426