This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/29236] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus ambiguity with templates + friend
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Oct 2006 16:23:11 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/29236] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus ambiguity with templates + friend
- References: <bug-29236-13309@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #7 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2006-10-10 16:23 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus ambiguity with
templates + friend
bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:
> We've been over that before, Andrew. It has always been the case that
> bugmasters do the initial triage, including setting an initial priority.
> We've done that at least back to 2002, when we were still using GNATS instead
> of bugzilla. It is also true that the RM has the prerogative to downgrade
> priorities if he doesn't deem things that important.
I have asked that all bugs be left at P3, and that I set their initial
priority. I also welcome input about what the priority should be,
ideally in the audit trail for the PR itself. But, looking at P3 bugs
is how I see what the new bugs are.
Thanks,
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29236