This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/29317] gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure
- From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Oct 2006 15:00:18 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/29317] gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure
- References: <bug-29317-10259@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #3 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2006-10-02 15:00 -------
Subject: Re: gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 02:27:47PM -0000, Francois-Xavier dot Coudert at ens
dot fr wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier dot Coudert at ens dot fr 2006-10-02 14:27 -------
> Subject: Re: gfortran.dg/exponent_1.f90 failure
>
> > If you have a good mpfr, then the problem may be similar to the one
> > with nearest_1.f90 where the extra precision in the registers is bad
> > (ie., add -ffloat-store to the test).
>
> I do have mpfr-2.2.0, and adding -ffloat-store doesn't change the test.
>
>
Can you send me the -fdump-tree-original file?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29317