This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug debug/27574] [4.1 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable in a C++ constructor



------- Comment #8 from joern dot rennecke at st dot com  2006-07-25 17:08 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.1 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable
in a C++ constructor

drow at false dot org wrote:

>------- Comment #7 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-07-25 13:27 -------
>Subject: Re:  [4.1 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable
>in a C++ constructor
>
>On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:14:46PM -0000, amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>  
>
>>If this is fixed on mainline, the fix must be rather recent; I see this still
>>failing with
>>r115417: GNU C++ version 4.2.0 20060713 (experimental).
>>What is the oldest gcc 4.2 version where you saw this work?
>>    
>>
>
>I tested it on HEAD on the day I posted (2006-07-22).  Could you check
>whether that works for you, or it's something environmental?
>  
>
When I compile the testcase (using -g -O0) with a cc1plus built from todays
sources (r115734), a test search for "problem" in the .s file comes up 
empty.
OTOH, both a native and a cross build eventually failed.

Can you find out the exact version of gcc that you tested?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27574


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]