This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug debug/27574] [4.1 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable in a C++ constructor
- From: "amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Jul 2006 12:14:46 -0000
- Subject: [Bug debug/27574] [4.1 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable in a C++ constructor
- References: <bug-27574-5394@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #6 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-25 12:14 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> I am not going to track down what did it, but something has fixed this on the
> 4.2 branch. I can reproduce it on Debian's 4.1 branch snapshot. If someone
> wants to fix it on 4.1, it should probably be easy to use the regression hunter
> to identify what patch caused the string "problem" to appear in the assembly
> output. It is probably something in the last two and a half months, since the
> bug was reported, but I do not see any obvious candidates.
>
If this is fixed on mainline, the fix must be rather recent; I see this still
failing with
r115417: GNU C++ version 4.2.0 20060713 (experimental).
What is the oldest gcc 4.2 version where you saw this work?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27574