This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared
- From: "ams at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 15 Jul 2006 16:25:10 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared
- References: <bug-28102-12387@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #11 from ams at gnu dot org 2006-07-15 16:25 -------
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared
> Can you please just apply the patch and close the bug?
Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.
The patch is correct, that you think that the code we use from
*/linux.h should be in */gnu.h is not related to this bug. This is
the setup we have used for almost 10 years, and I see no reason to
change it. The setup works, it minimises the workload on both
parties, and it is clean.
If you don't want to commit the patch then that is fine, it isn't like
GCC can even compile on the GNU system due to the other bugs with
patches being neglected (mostly by me).
Happy hacking.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102