[Bug c/28137] New: "make check" gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c

["duncan_roe at acslink dot net dot au" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

Configured as follows:

unset ARCH SRC TARGET
ARCH=amd64
SRC=/usr/src/gcc-4.1.1
ARCH=${ARCH:-i486}
TARGET=${TARGET:-$ARCH-pc-linux-gnu}
(time nice $SRC/configure \
  --prefix=/usr/local64/gcc402 \
  --enable-shared \
  --enable-threads=posix \
  --enable-__cxa_atexit \
  --disable-checking \
  --with-gnu-ld \
  --target=${TARGET} \
  --host=${TARGET} \
  --build=${TARGET} \
  )2>&1|tee heeconf
unset ARCH SRC TARGET

then make bootstrap; make -j 8 check gives these 10 failures:

FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int int (test for errors, line
1157)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int long (test for errors,
line 1158)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int float (test for errors,
line 1159)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int double (test for errors,
line 1160)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int signed (test for errors,
line 1161)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int unsigned (test for errors,
line 1162)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int _Bool (test for errors,
line 1163)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c unsigned long long int _Complex (test for errors,
line 1164)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-typespec-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/visibility-11.c scan-assembler memcpy@PLT

System is dual Opteron with 4GB RAM (3.5GB usable owing to stupid BIOS)


-- 
           Summary: "make check" gets 10 FAIL reports with gcc.dg/c99-
                    typespec-1.c
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: duncan_roe at acslink dot net dot au
 GCC build triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28137