This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/27733] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Large compile time regression



------- Comment #14 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2006-06-08 15:37 -------
Well, it shouldn't.  My guess could be that we are hitting the case where the
logic is flawed.  The we fill the cache with the algorithm for say 0x100000085
(but then we only write 0x84 in the cache), and then use it for 0x85.  The
synth_mult logic then could be resilient enough to not generate wrong code but
just code with wrong cost measures.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27733


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]