This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tree-optimization/27882] [4.2 regression] segfault in ipa-inline.c, if (e->callee->local.disregard_inline_limits



------- Comment #14 from hubicka at ucw dot cz  2006-06-07 12:18 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 regression] segfault in ipa-inline.c, if
(e->callee->local.disregard_inline_limits

> 
> 
> ------- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-06-07 06:00 -------
> Wait in tree-inline.c, we do:
>   /* Update callgraph if needed.  */
>   cgraph_remove_node (cg_edge->callee);
> 
> Isn't that wrong as we could inline the callee a couple of times?

It should be OK - if we inline multiple times, we create multiple nodes.
I will look into this.

Honza


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27882


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]