This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/26891] Automatic conversion for optional parameters of missing dummies



------- Comment #2 from paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr  2006-03-28 09:46 -------
Subject: Re:  Automatic conversion for optional parameters
 of missing dummies

toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl wrote:

>------- Comment #1 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl  2006-03-28 08:15 -------
>  
>
>>   logical, optional, intent(in) :: back
>>   myscan = scan (str, substr, back)
>>    
>>
>
>I thought passing non-present optional arguments down to routines as an
>optional argument is within the confines of the Standard.
>
>If in doubt, consult comp.lang.fortran ...
>  
>
I would rather curl up in front of the fire with the standard - 
comp.lang.fortran comes with a population that seems excessively "up 
yours" on such matters.  I cannot be bothered with the aggression.

However, if you are right, that's great; I will spread the solution to 
all procedure calls.  Right now, I need to get out of this TRANSFER mess!

Best regards

Paul


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26891


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]