This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/25950] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] [DR 152] Reference binding and explicit copy constructors
- From: "gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Jan 2006 03:09:55 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/25950] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] [DR 152] Reference binding and explicit copy constructors
- References: <bug-25950-11686@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #11 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2006-01-25 03:09 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1] [DR 391] Reference binding and explicit copy
constructors
"hhinnant at apple dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| ------- Comment #9 from hhinnant at apple dot com 2006-01-25 02:54 -------
| (In reply to comment #8)
| > Changing to request for enhancement. The requested behaviour is a change
| > in th working paper. Existing behaviour is what is required by the
standard
| > (even when it can be argued that checking for something that is elided is
| > suboptimal.)
|
| Did you read comment 3?
Yes. Is your claim that whether the copy constructor is converting or
not does not matter?
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25950