This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug ada/25900] [4.2 Regression] ICE on ACATS cxac004 in Tree-VRP



------- Comment #6 from law at redhat dot com  2006-01-24 22:50 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] ICE on ACATS cxac004 in
        Tree-VRP

On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 22:15 +0000, laurent at guerby dot net wrote:
> 
> ------- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net  2006-01-24 22:15 -------
> c99004a randomly fails PR21317, unrelated to your fix, so go ahead :).
Ah.    Well, I feel better now -- I couldn't see how my change would
be causing an execution failure regression.... It should only have been
avoiding the segfault!

I'm going to ponder the SCEV code in question a little more -- while
it's easy enough to filter out unwanted stuff in VRP, I'm really
more concerned that SCEV gave us junk in the first place.

jeff


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25900


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]