This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/25649] [4.2 regression] Bogus "uninitialized" warning
- From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 24 Jan 2006 18:38:18 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/25649] [4.2 regression] Bogus "uninitialized" warning
- References: <bug-25649-2736@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #19 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-01-24 18:38 -------
Indeed, as I said already, it's only by *chance* that the warning was not
emitted before, because the logic of the library has not changed and in fact,
**cannot** be changed. Really, if we want something ""better"", either the
compiler provides __attribute__((uninitialized)) or someone changes the
standard.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25649