This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/22275] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] bitfield layout change (regression?)
- From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Jan 2006 23:33:56 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/22275] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] bitfield layout change (regression?)
- References: <bug-22275-3760@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #25 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-16 23:33 -------
Re. comment #23, iiuc the old behavior was to align the zero-length bitfield,
not the next field. My patch (one of them anyway) switches the order of
EMPTY_FIELD_BOUNDARY and PCC_BITFIELD_TYPE_MATTERS back to how it was before
Jason's change, but that change alone is not enough to fix the bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22275