This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug rtl-optimization/25636] [4.2 Regression] cc1 and cc1plus --help core
- From: "drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Jan 2006 03:16:38 -0000
- Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/25636] [4.2 Regression] cc1 and cc1plus --help core
- References: <bug-25636-11951@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #19 from drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2006-01-16 03:16 -------
(In reply to comment #18)
> (In reply to comment #17)
> > Yes, it is unnecessary, but not wrong, since if you take a closer look, it is
> > just
>
> Actually it is wrong as it is in read only memory.
OK, then there may actually be two bugs at once. Or is my argument about the
missing third argument wrong? Am I missing something somewhere?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25636