This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/25701] New: gcc.texi missing @direntry for g++
- From: "tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Jan 2006 21:17:28 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/25701] New: gcc.texi missing @direntry for g++
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
If you go to the top-level info node, you will see that there
is no direct menu entry for the "g++" command. I think we should
have one, which means adding an @direntry for it.
(See gcc/java/gcj.texi for an example of per-command @direntry use)
More generally I think we should have an @direntry for each
program we install in $bindir. I haven't looked to see what other
ones might be missing.
--
Summary: gcc.texi missing @direntry for g++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25701