This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/25125] [4.1 Regression] (short) ((int)(unsigned short) + (int)) is done in the wrong type
- From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Dec 2005 17:06:02 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/25125] [4.1 Regression] (short) ((int)(unsigned short) + (int)) is done in the wrong type
- References: <bug-25125-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #19 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-12-27 17:06 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] (short) ((int)(unsigned short) + (int)) is done
in the wrong type
> I am having tough time building the compiler for hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
> These days gcc won't even allow you to build cc1 without an assembler and such.
That's a regression. It always used to be possible to build
cc1 on x86, etc. I'll take a look.
> How do you build your compiler? Using the native assembler?
I always use gas.
> By the way, could you tell me the sizes of short and int on
> hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11?
2 and 4 bytes, respectively.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25125