This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/25260] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Forward explicit intantiation declaration doesn't mix well with static integral member
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Dec 2005 16:14:28 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/25260] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Forward explicit intantiation declaration doesn't mix well with static integral member
- References: <bug-25260-11057@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-12-20 16:14 -------
Yes, you were wrong. This certainly can't be equivalent to the enum snippet
you posted since once can take the address of this static member, but can't
take the address of an enum member.
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25260