This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/23954] [4.1/4.2 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution, -Os
- From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Dec 2005 17:38:17 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/23954] [4.1/4.2 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution, -Os
- References: <bug-23954-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-12-18 17:38 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c
execution, -Os
> First, it looks from the command lines in the report that the problematic
> compiler is GCC 3.3. But the report is about gcc 4.1.0.
No, it wasn't 3.3. Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00754.html.
> Second, I can't reproduce the problem with
> "GNU C version 4.1.0 20051216 (prerelease) (hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu)".
>
> I tried "./xgcc -B. t.c -Os -mschedule=7100LC" but I get warnings:
> t.c: In function 'testA':
> t.c:90: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion
> t.c: In function 'testK':
> t.c:100: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion
The tests are built with "-w".
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23954