This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/23954] [4.1/4.2 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution, -Os
- From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Dec 2005 15:42:02 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/23954] [4.1/4.2 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c execution, -Os
- References: <bug-23954-276@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #8 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-18 15:42 -------
What is one supposed to do with this bug report?
First, it looks from the command lines in the report that the problematic
compiler is GCC 3.3. But the report is about gcc 4.1.0.
Second, I can't reproduce the problem with
"GNU C version 4.1.0 20051216 (prerelease) (hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu)".
I tried "./xgcc -B. t.c -Os -mschedule=7100LC" but I get warnings:
t.c: In function 'testA':
t.c:90: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion
t.c: In function 'testK':
t.c:100: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion
So how am I going to reproduce this problem?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23954