This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/25304] std::fill_n, std::generate_n incorrect signature
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Dec 2005 16:23:29 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/25304] std::fill_n, std::generate_n incorrect signature
- References: <bug-25304-1186@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #14 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-12-08 16:23 -------
Subject: Re: std::fill_n, std::generate_n incorrect signature
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| 2- As I see the issue, it depends a lot on the actual timeframe of
| the possible enhancement to the standard. I mean, if we are thinking
| about C++0x, seems rather far in time. I think most of our users
| would not perceive our practice as randomly going back and forward
| on something.
Fair enough.
(At Lillehammer, we set to have x, in C++0x, a digit; so that means
we're almost done by 2007. That is not far, given that LWG would not
need to wait 2007 before agreeing on the issue. I was amazed to
discover that CWG two two meetings to open an issue and move it to WP.
LWG could do the same. Hint, hint, :-))
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25304