This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/25304] std::fill_n, std::generate_n incorrect signature
- From: "sebor at roguewave dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Dec 2005 15:51:22 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/25304] std::fill_n, std::generate_n incorrect signature
- References: <bug-25304-1186@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #10 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2005-12-08 15:51 -------
No, I don't. The standard is clear and most of us seem to think it's "by
design." Rather I am suggesting is that we might want to discuss with the whole
LWG changing the return type as an enhancement.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25304