This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug rtl-optimization/24823] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in insert_save, at caller-save.c:719



------- Comment #16 from krebbel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-21 17:36 -------
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > The testcase to get that construct is:
> Compiling with -mpowerpc64 to get the mixed mode.  I would not doubt that the
> arm failure is a similar issue but not with complex types.
So maybe we can remove the mode check:
 && GET_MODE (testreg) == BLKmode)

The only problem I could think of is when we have a MEM within the PARALLEL,
then we should rather fall through to the code calling mark_used_regs
recursively in order to mark the regs holding the address as used. So perhaps
it is necessary to make sure that the PARALLEL only contains regs.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24823


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]