[Bug c++/24915] New: Overload errors generated without template instantiations for class member templates

["nem3 at pitt dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

template<typename T>
struct is_int
{
  static const bool value = false;
};

template <>
struct is_int<int>
{
  static const bool value = true;
};

template <bool Cond, typename T = void>
struct enable_if
{};

template <typename T>
struct enable_if<true, T>
{ typedef T type; };

class test
{
public:
   template <typename T>
   typename enable_if<is_int<T>::value>::type func(T x)
   {}

   template <typename T>
   typename enable_if<!is_int<T>::value>::type func(T x)
   {}
};

fails to compile on 4.0.2 with
t2.cpp:29: error: ?template<class T> typename enable_if<(! is_int<T>::value),
void>::type test::func(T)? cannot be overloaded
t2.cpp:25: error: with ?template<class T> typename enable_if<is_int<T>::value,
void>::type test::func(T)?

fails to compile on 3.4.2 with
t2.cpp:30: error: `template<class T> typename enable_if<(! is_int<T>::value),
void>::type test::func(T)' and `template<class T> typename enable_if<
is_int<T>::value, void>::type test::func(T)' cannot be overloaded

However the same two functions will compile when not defined as part of a class 

<insert the enable_if and is_int from above>

template <typename T>
typename enable_if<is_int<T>::value>::type func(T x)
{}

template <typename T>
typename enable_if<!is_int<T>::value>::type func(T x)
{}

both msvc7.1 and Comeau 4.3.3 will accept it. 

I don't think that this is duplicate of 15882.

The problem appears to be that syntax checking is catching this before SFINAE
has a chance to prune the overload set. At any rate there are not template
instantiations in the test case.


-- 
           Summary: Overload errors generated without template
                    instantiations for class member templates
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: nem3 at pitt dot edu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24915