This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/23497] [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...' warning about std::complex<T>
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Nov 2005 20:08:25 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/23497] [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...' warning about std::complex<T>
- References: <bug-23497-2589@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #33 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-11-16 20:08 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...'
warning about std::complex<T>
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #32 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 19:58 -------
> (In reply to comment #31)
>
>>This is not a valid argument.
>
> What would you consider a valid argument for an extension which is not that
> well documented?
We're not talking about the extension; we're talking about the warning.
Your job is to explain why a user wants to see that warning on that code.
Thankfully, RTH is going to eliminate the warning. You can file a bug
about the "missing" warning, if you think it's important.
You can also lobby for removing the extension, if you like -- but please
don't do it in this PR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23497