This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/23497] [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...' warning about std::complex<T>



------- Comment #33 from mark at codesourcery dot com  2005-11-16 20:08 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...'
 warning about std::complex<T>

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #32 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-16 19:58 -------
> (In reply to comment #31)
> 
>>This is not a valid argument.
> 
> What would you consider a valid argument for an extension which is not that
> well documented?

We're not talking about the extension; we're talking about the warning.

Your job is to explain why a user wants to see that warning on that code.

Thankfully, RTH is going to eliminate the warning.  You can file a bug
about the "missing" warning, if you think it's important.

You can also lobby for removing the extension, if you like -- but please
don't do it in this PR.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23497


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]