This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/23497] [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...' warning about std::complex<T>



------- Comment #22 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-16 13:36 -------
(In reply to comment #21)
> For the libgfortran issue (libgfortran uses __imag__ as a lvalue) what should
> be done? Who can decide whether __imag__ is or isn't a lvalue? Sorry to ask for
> the obvious, but I'm lost.
> Anyhow, if the change in behaviour between 4.0 and 4.1 is intended, it should
> surely be noted somewhere.

Note I never said __imag__ a should not act like an lvalue. I just said that
__imag__ a = b; acts like a = COMPLEX<REAL<a>, b> which is just like what
a = (a&0xFFFF0000)|(b&0x0000FFFF) does.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23497


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]