This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all uninit variable issues



------- Comment #4 from law at redhat dot com  2005-11-09 00:02 -------
Created an attachment (id=10181)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10181&action=view)
Proposed patch and new testcases

I'm not comfortable self-approving this patch; the option processing code is
totally new to me and I have no idea if I got it right.  And while I believe
the sense of -Wuninitialized is correct (no change in current behavior), I
don't think we have reached a consensus on that issue.

I will note that after reviewing all the PRs, by far the most common complaint
is false positives,  #2 is missing warnings, particularly for objects which
have had their address taken, #3 is missing warnings in unreachable/dead code
(which we can now detect with -Wuninitialized=2 using this patch).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]