This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/24704] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] __gnu_cxx::__exchange_and_add is out of line and called even for single threaded applications using std::string
- From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Nov 2005 17:07:55 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/24704] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] __gnu_cxx::__exchange_and_add is out of line and called even for single threaded applications using std::string
- References: <bug-24704-7094@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-11-07 17:07 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I've now verified that even when the entire compiler is compiled with
> --enable-threads=single, the resulting libstdc++ does the full 'lock; xadd'
> thing in __exchange_and_add,
This is well known, if you only cared to ask (sorry ;) If you look at the
sources it's clear that nothing about threads changes the choice of the
atomicity.h. I agree however, that it's a very good idea to have that
configuration option influencing also the atomicity things.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24704