[Bug c++/19159] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Undefined symbol: vtable for __cxxabiv1::__vmi_class_type_info

["mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Comment #34 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-31 02:08 -------
According to the thread starting with the reference in Comment #31, this is
just a spurious warning on systems without weak symbols.  As such, it's never
going to be release-critical.

The two leading proposals were made for resolving the problem: (1) use a
dynamic initialization on systems without weak symbols, or (2) warn only if the
static variable is actually addressed, as otherwise the fact that there are
multiple copies doesn't matter.  I agree with Jason that (2) is the best
option, and it should be relatively easy to implement, given that we already
mark things as addressed; we could just move the warning to that location.


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|link-failure                |diagnostic


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19159