This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/23524] [4.1 Regression]bigger version of mov + cmp produced
- From: "dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Oct 2005 16:43:37 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/23524] [4.1 Regression]bigger version of mov + cmp produced
- References: <bug-23524-1008@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #8 from dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2005-10-27 16:43 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Could the dear reported at least try to provide a small test case?
The testcase in the attachment contains only a 4 lines function:
HandleDeIconify, the rest is just fluff to allow it to compile. Granted a lot
of it can be pruned, but I don't think it stops trying to debug the problem.
> I think this should not be marked as a regression.
Why not? It is a regression.
> It's just sad that this
> kind of non-bug keeps the regression count high, when in reality GCC 4.1
> produces smaller code overall.
PR23153 tells a completely different story about codesize (at least for i686).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23524