This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libfortran/24432] [4.1 regression] Missing symbols
- From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Oct 2005 21:59:36 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libfortran/24432] [4.1 regression] Missing symbols
- References: <bug-24432-226@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-18 21:59 -------
> This is particularly annoying, since sparc-solaris2.9 is one of the platforms
> on which I regtested this patch!
Either you have a C99-aware version of Solaris 9 or another libgfortran is
picked up at link-time. Do you HAVE_COPYSIGNF HAVE_NEXTAFTERF in config.h?
> Other than that, I concur in diagnosis and solution. Will implement that as
> soon as possible (most probably on Wednesday evening, European time).
Thanks in advance.
> Sorry, I didn't know that rule.
It's not really a rule, but that would have saved me a few minutes looking for
an email address accepted by Bugzilla (I successfully tried @ens.fr then
@gnu.gcc.org then @gmail.com)
> Will use my gcc.gnu.org address in changelogs in the future.
@ens.fr is just fine I'd say (and we're exactly 2 with .fr address so... :-) as
long as you can be CCed in Bugzilla.
> Does that need to be retroactive?
No, don't bother about that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24432