This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug bootstrap/24297] [4.1 Regression] libtool: link: unable to infer tagged configuration



------- Comment #7 from bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-10-12 08:46 -------
I'm starting to think that the way we detect target tools is incredibly
overengineered -> and hence buggy.

We should just *know* that an in-tree "as" has already been compiled wherever
AS_FOR_TARGET is needed!  We have dependencies to ensure that, everything else
is unnecessary.

(Similarly for CC_FOR_TARGET, which in this PR is being misdetected as
not-yet-available).

I have a prototype patch to do so, but it is quite big and I have to test it
really a lot.  On the other hand, the patch has

 3 files changed, 198 insertions(+), 367 deletions(-)

and this intrigues me, especially because it removes a lot of cruft from
Makefile.tpl.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24297


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]