This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/24232] [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in sched-ebb.c:220 add_missing_bbs
- From: "wilson at specifix dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Oct 2005 06:26:36 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/24232] [4.1 Regression] ICE: segmentation fault in sched-ebb.c:220 add_missing_bbs
- References: <bug-24232-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #10 from wilson at specifix dot com 2005-10-11 06:26 -------
Created an attachment (id=9960)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9960&action=view)
trivial hack to make the reduced testcase work
Actually, come to think of it, other targets don't use schedule_ebbs unless the
-fsched2-use-superblocks option is used, which is probably why others haven't
run into this problem. I haven't checked to see if schedule_ebbs has other
ways of preventing jump_insns from scheduling across each other.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24232