This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/24119] gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
- From: "h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 4 Oct 2005 14:24:12 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/24119] gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
- References: <bug-24119-11434@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #6 from h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl 2005-10-04 14:24 -------
Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
On 2 Oct 2005 13:23:41 -0000, "h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl"
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> ------- Comment #5 from h dot m dot brand at xs4all dot nl 2005-10-02
> 13:23 ------- Subject: Re: gcc-4.x fails to build on AIX 5.2.0.0-ML04
>
> On 2 Oct 2005 04:45:37 -0000, "dje at gcc dot gnu dot org"
> <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > ------- Comment #4 from dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-02 04:45
> > ------- Also, why are you adding "--with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld" to the
> > configure command? There should be only one "ld" on the system and the GCC
> > configuration process should find it automatically? Do you have GNU
> > Binutils installed? It also is possible that the gcc-4.0.0-20040919
> > snapshot cannot bootstrap GCC.
>
> I re-ran without -B
> All binutils are disabled after previous advice, so I only use AIX' ld
I have upgraded the system from 5200-04 to 5200-07, and nothing changed.
Just to let you know.
Next step is to upgrade vac-6.0.0.11 to vac-7.0.0.3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24119