This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug ada/24003] [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL 17 regressions on x86-linux, fixed and decimal arithmetic broken
- From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Oct 2005 22:30:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug ada/24003] [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL 17 regressions on x86-linux, fixed and decimal arithmetic broken
- References: <bug-24003-7210@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Comment #13 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2005-10-02 22:30 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL 17 regressions on x86-linux, fixed
and decimal arithmetic broken
>
>
> ------- Comment #12 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-02 21:55 -------
> > Can you please check if -fno-tree-ter makes the bug go away? We've
> > chatted recently with Jakub concerning bug in argument saving in nested
> > call and -maccumulate-outgoing-args. I was under impression that we
> > should no longer produce the nested calls out of ter but aparently it is
> > still being done (that results in inferrior code quality too as we can't
> > generated nested calls very sanely)
>
> To back up your hypothesis, I can say that I'm *not* seeing the failures on
> i586.
That seems consistent. i586 defaults to -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args.
const int x86_accumulate_outgoing_args = m_ATHLON_K8 | m_PENT4 | m_NOCONA |
m_PPRO;
Honza
>
>
> --
>
> ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
> | |org
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24003
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24003