This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Sep 2005 20:40:33 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
- References: <20050714141428.22488.micis@gmx.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-09-28 20:40 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack
calculates offset incorrectly
dberlin at dberlin dot org wrote:
>>>And besides, my approach isn't lying at all about this testcase; since
>>>there's only one appearance of the virtual base, it appears exactly
>>>where the field lists say it will. Daniel agreed that the problem is in
>>>his code.
>>
>>What I meant by "lying" (an admittedly overly contentious choice of
>>word) was that the field for B-in-C is marked as having the complete B
>>type due to the code at the end of layout_class_type. However, the A
>>virtual base isn't located in that B; it's located after the data
>>members of C. So, the base field for B is incorrect.
>
>
> If you give me guys a way to detect this case from the middle end, i'm
> happy to say "Don't walk this structure, it's not really there".
>
> :)
I don't think there's anyway to do that reliably.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488