This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Sep 2005 22:40:55 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/18803] [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template
- References: <20041202234223.18803.bangerth@dealii.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-09-16 22:40 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 regression] rejects access to operator() in template
"reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| On 16 Sep, nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
| > IMHO reverting 18445 would be the most prudent thing to do. The combination
| > of 18845+18803 are touching too many things for my liking.
|
| Gaby, would that be OK with you?
Yes -- fixes for ice-on-invalid are nice to have but they are not
critical, especially if their fixing introduces more potential for
regression.
| I'd revert the patch for PR 18445 on the 3.4 branch, add the testcase
| for PR18803 to the 3.4 branch (bootstrapped and regtested, of course),
| and close PR 18445 as fixed in 4.0.0 and WONTFIX in 3.4.
Thanks!
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18803