This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/23853] [4.1 regression] ICE: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:4270
- From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Sep 2005 13:54:44 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/23853] [4.1 regression] ICE: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:4270
- References: <20050913085028.23853.micis@gmx.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-13 13:54 -------
it's ICEing because host_integerp complains that TREE_OVERFLOW is set:
#1 0x084f7397 in tree_low_cst (t=0x4022daf8, pos=1) at tree.c:4273
Line number 4273 out of range; tree.c has 2318 lines.
(gdb) call debug_tree(t)
<integer_cst 0x4022daf8 type <integer_type 0x4019c78c> constant invariant
public static overflow 0>
backtrace:
#0 fancy_abort (file=0x8745bfc "../../../src/gcc-unpatched/gcc/tree.c",
line=4273, function=0x8746b83 "tree_low_cst") at diagnostic.c:590
#1 0x084f7397 in tree_low_cst (t=0x4022daf8, pos=1) at tree.c:4273
#2 0x08189dec in vect_compute_data_ref_alignment (dr=0x8831090)
at tree-vect-analyze.c:784
#3 0x08189eb0 in vect_compute_data_refs_alignment (loop_vinfo=0x8830e90)
at tree-vect-analyze.c:810
#4 0x0818abca in vect_analyze_data_refs_alignment (loop_vinfo=0x8830e90)
at tree-vect-analyze.c:1249
#5 0x0818ccb4 in vect_analyze_loop (loop=0x881aa68)
at tree-vect-analyze.c:2013
#6 0x08187c7a in vectorize_loops (loops=0x8833030) at tree-vectorizer.c:2050
#7 0x081789fd in tree_vectorize () at tree-ssa-loop.c:194
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Known to fail| |4.1.0
Known to work| |4.0.2
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-09-13 13:54:43
date| |
Summary|ICE: in tree_low_cst, at |[4.1 regression] ICE: in
|tree.c:4270 |tree_low_cst, at tree.c:4270
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23853