This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/23075] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Redundant / bogus warning
- From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Sep 2005 20:11:26 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/23075] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Redundant / bogus warning
- References: <20050726121309.23075.neil@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-06 20:11 -------
Subject: Bug 23075
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: jakub@gcc.gnu.org 2005-09-06 20:11:09
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog c-typeck.c tree-cfg.c
gcc/cp : ChangeLog cp-tree.h semantics.c typeck.c
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn: pr23075.C
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg: pr23075.c
Log message:
PR c/23075
* c-typeck.c (c_finish_return): Set TREE_NO_WARNING on RETURN_EXPR
if "return with no value, in function returning non-void" warning
has been issued.
* tree-cfg.c (execute_warn_function_return): Don't look at
RETURN_EXPRs with TREE_NO_WARNING set.
* typeck.c (check_return_expr): Add no_warning argument. Set
*no_warning to true if "return-statement with no value, in function
returning" warning has been issued.
* cp-tree.h (check_return_expr): Adjust prototype.
* semantics.c (finish_return_stmt): Set TREE_NO_WARNING if
check_return_expr set *no_warning to true.
* gcc.dg/pr23075.c: New test.
* g++.dg/warn/pr23075.C: New test.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=2.7592.2.415&r2=2.7592.2.416
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-typeck.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.419.2.12&r2=1.419.2.13
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-cfg.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=2.151.2.3&r2=2.151.2.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.4648.2.94&r2=1.4648.2.95
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.1106.2.14&r2=1.1106.2.15
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/semantics.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.463.2.8&r2=1.463.2.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/typeck.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.616.2.17&r2=1.616.2.18
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=1.5084.2.386&r2=1.5084.2.387
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/pr23075.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr23075.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&only_with_tag=gcc-4_0-branch&r1=NONE&r2=1.1.2.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23075