[Bug c++/20427] [3.4 Regression] 'new int [2] ()' not default initialized

["redi at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

------- Additional Comments From redi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-19 22:06 -------
I see a similar problem with uninitialized elements of an array with a new
initializer, but on mainline and 4.0.

#include <iostream>
void f(int n)
{
    int * a = new int [n] () ;
    for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
    {
        std::cout << a[i]++ << ' ';
    }
    std::cout << '\n';
    delete[] a;
}

int main()
{
    f(5);
    f(5);
    f(5);
    f(5);
}

With mainline build from today I see:
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 1 1
0 0 2 2 2
0 0 3 3 3
Each line should also be all 0s because the new initializer should default-init
all the elements, but some of the elements have not been reset after they were
set during the first function call.

Should I file a different bug, or is this the same problem but unseen until now
on 4.x?



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |redi at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20427